Why “Criminals” Should Have Rights, Part 9

Another example of the importance of protecting the rights of the accused: a man convicted of rape, whose “confession” after an 8-hour interrogation was inconsistent with the facts of the case, who was not identified by the victim from a photo line-up shortly after the crime, who was cleared as the perpetrator via DNA testing, still sits in jail despite the victim saying only one person committed the crimes and a DNA profile run through a federal database pointing to a man with multiple convictions.



One Response to “Why “Criminals” Should Have Rights, Part 9”

  1. John Stossel’s NSA Apathy | The Blog For Truth, Justice, & The Josh Way Says:

    […] recently posted a story about a man proven innocent by DNA evidence still being held in jail; this trend is not unique. The […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: